Skip to main content Skip to footer

Standish Standoff: Supreme Court clarifies what counts as ‘shared’ in divorce

A landmark ruling from the UK Supreme Court in Standish v Standish has just reshaped how courts decide what’s fair when dividing assets in divorce

What happens to the family home, an inheritance, or a gifted property when a marriage ends? A landmark ruling from the UK Supreme Court in Standish v Standish (2 July 2025) has just reshaped how courts decide what’s fair when dividing assets in divorce.

Written by
Charley Kelly, Associate Solicitor in the Family Department
Charley Kelly
Senior Associate Solicitor

Family Law Associate Solicitor Charley Kelly from our Leicester office discusses what you need to know and how it could affect your financial future.

Background: what was the case about?

The case involved a wife appealing a lower court decision, asking the Supreme Court to clarify how to distinguish between matrimonial and non-matrimonial property. In other words: which assets should be shared equally, and which should remain with the person who brought them into the marriage?

Key definitions: matrimonial vs non-matrimonial property

The Supreme Court offered clear guidance:

Non-matrimonial property includes:

  • assets owned before the marriage
  • inheritances
  • gifts received by one spouse

These are generally not subject to the 50/50 sharing rule.

Matrimonial property includes:

  • assets acquired during the marriage
  • property that reflects the couple’s joint efforts or shared life

These are usually divided equally.

Quote from the Judgement (para 47):
“Matrimonial property comprises the fruits of the marriage partnership or reflects the marriage partnership or is the product of the parties’ common endeavours.”

But who owns it? Legal title isn’t everything

The Court made it clear: whose name is on the deed or account doesn’t decide whether an asset is shared. What matters is how the asset was treated during the marriage.

When non-matrimonial assets become shared

Sometimes, non-matrimonial property can become matrimonial. This happens when:

  • the asset is used by both spouses (e.g. a holiday home)
  • it’s placed in joint names
  • it’s treated as part of the family’s shared wealth

However, if an asset remains in one spouse’s name and is kept separate, it’s more likely to stay non-matrimonial.

Example:
If you inherit a flat and keep it rented out in your name, it’s likely to remain yours. But if you and your spouse renovate it together and use it as a second home, it may become a shared asset.

What about tax planning transfers?

The Court also addressed a common scenario: transferring assets to a spouse for tax reasons, which was the subject of the appeal. If this is done purely for tax efficiency and not as a genuine gift, the asset will likely remain non-matrimonial.

Why this ruling matters

This decision gives couples and their lawyers much-needed clarity. It confirms that:

  • not all assets are automatically split 50/50
  • the origin and treatment of an asset both matter
  • courts will still consider non-matrimonial assets if needed to meet one spouse’s financial needs

Dividing assets during divorce can be complex, especially when inheritances, gifts, or pre-marital property are involved.

Speak to one of our family law specialists on 03456 465 465 or email enquiries@rotherabray.co.uk for clear, compassionate advice tailored to your situation.

 

Disclaimer: This blog is for information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice, please contact us on 03456 465 465 or email enquiries@rotherabray.co.uk to get tailored advice specific to your circumstances from our qualified lawyers.

Contact Form

Please give as much detail as possible, to enable us to assess your matter and direct it to the most appropriate person.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Share Post
Related News
Deaths of three babies lead to guilty plea by Nottingham University Hospitals

Ockenden Review into Nottingham maternity services published

The long-anticipated Ockenden Review into maternity services at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (NUH) has now been published.

Working alongside our lawyers and Counsel, our paralegals have played a vital role both at hearings and behind the scenes at the Nottingham Inquiry

A paralegal perspective on working on the Nottingham Inquiry

The Nottingham Inquiry represents one of the most significant and sensitive matters our teams have supported, following the tragic events in Nottingham in June 2023.

Working alongside our lawyers and Counsel, our paralegals have played a vital role both at hearings and behind the scenes, supporting our clients Wayne Birkett and Sharon Miller.