Skip to main content Skip to footer

Standish Standoff: Supreme Court clarifies what counts as ‘shared’ in divorce

A landmark ruling from the UK Supreme Court in Standish v Standish has just reshaped how courts decide what’s fair when dividing assets in divorce

What happens to the family home, an inheritance, or a gifted property when a marriage ends? A landmark ruling from the UK Supreme Court in Standish v Standish (2 July 2025) has just reshaped how courts decide what’s fair when dividing assets in divorce.

Written by
Charley Kelly, Associate Solicitor in the Family Department
Charley Kelly
Senior Associate Solicitor

Family Law Associate Solicitor Charley Kelly from our Leicester office discusses what you need to know and how it could affect your financial future.

Background: what was the case about?

The case involved a wife appealing a lower court decision, asking the Supreme Court to clarify how to distinguish between matrimonial and non-matrimonial property. In other words: which assets should be shared equally, and which should remain with the person who brought them into the marriage?

Key definitions: matrimonial vs non-matrimonial property

The Supreme Court offered clear guidance:

Non-matrimonial property includes:

  • assets owned before the marriage
  • inheritances
  • gifts received by one spouse

These are generally not subject to the 50/50 sharing rule.

Matrimonial property includes:

  • assets acquired during the marriage
  • property that reflects the couple’s joint efforts or shared life

These are usually divided equally.

Quote from the Judgement (para 47):
“Matrimonial property comprises the fruits of the marriage partnership or reflects the marriage partnership or is the product of the parties’ common endeavours.”

But who owns it? Legal title isn’t everything

The Court made it clear: whose name is on the deed or account doesn’t decide whether an asset is shared. What matters is how the asset was treated during the marriage.

When non-matrimonial assets become shared

Sometimes, non-matrimonial property can become matrimonial. This happens when:

  • the asset is used by both spouses (e.g. a holiday home)
  • it’s placed in joint names
  • it’s treated as part of the family’s shared wealth

However, if an asset remains in one spouse’s name and is kept separate, it’s more likely to stay non-matrimonial.

Example:
If you inherit a flat and keep it rented out in your name, it’s likely to remain yours. But if you and your spouse renovate it together and use it as a second home, it may become a shared asset.

What about tax planning transfers?

The Court also addressed a common scenario: transferring assets to a spouse for tax reasons, which was the subject of the appeal. If this is done purely for tax efficiency and not as a genuine gift, the asset will likely remain non-matrimonial.

Why this ruling matters

This decision gives couples and their lawyers much-needed clarity. It confirms that:

  • not all assets are automatically split 50/50
  • the origin and treatment of an asset both matter
  • courts will still consider non-matrimonial assets if needed to meet one spouse’s financial needs

Dividing assets during divorce can be complex, especially when inheritances, gifts, or pre-marital property are involved.

Speak to one of our family law specialists on 03456 465 465 or email enquiries@rotherabray.co.uk for clear, compassionate advice tailored to your situation.

 

Disclaimer: This blog is for information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice, please contact us on 03456 465 465 or email enquiries@rotherabray.co.uk to get tailored advice specific to your circumstances from our qualified lawyers.

Contact Form

Please give as much detail as possible, to enable us to assess your matter and direct it to the most appropriate person.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Share Post
Related News
10 Downing Street

An open letter to Andy Burnham: we need a national public inquiry into maternity care

In an open letter to Andy Burnham, Greg Almond, Head of our Serious Personal Injury team, calls for a statutory public inquiry into maternity services across England, following the publication of the Ockenden Review and Amos Report.

Scotland has introduced the UK’s first statutory licensing framework through the Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Act 2026

Scotland moves ahead on non-surgical cosmetic procedure licensing – and England needs to catch up

The non-surgical cosmetic sector has long operated in a regulatory grey area, despite repeated calls for reform and well-documented risks. Scotland has taken the decisive step to address that gap by introducing the UK’s first statutory licensing framework for these procedures through the Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Act 2026. The Act received Royal Assent on 12 May 2026.