Skip to main content Skip to footer

Fraudulent Calumny – the poisoning of a testator’s mind

Lady justice fraudulent calumny

In the recently published case of Speakman v Muir and Others [2022] Lexis Citation 1487 the High Court in Birmingham found in favour of the claimant, Peter Speakman, in a claim for fraudulent calumny relating to his late father’s estate.

Written by
Richard Bates
Richard Bates
Head of Dispute Resolution & Partner

Richard Hammond a partner at Rothera Bray solicitors (instructing counsel James Weale), acted for the successful claimant. Rothera Bray’ contentious probate team were able to assist Mr Speakman in this difficult and sensitive matter and bring the claim to a successful conclusion.

Mr Speakman sought to set aside three wills his late father had made in quick succession in 2018. These wills reduced and finally extinguished his entitlement to half of the estate under a prior will from 2017. The beneficiaries of the 2018 wills were the late Mr Speakman’s cleaner and her two grandchildren who benefited from specific legacies of £100,000 each.

Amongst other claims, Mr Speakman said that the 2018 wills should be set aside for fraudulent calumny. He alleged that the defendant had poisoned his late father’s mind against him so that he was persuaded to change his prior wills to eventually exclude Mr Speakman entirely for her own benefit and that of her relatives.

The courts have in the past said that proving fraudulent calumny can be challenging because, in common with claims for undue influence, it is often difficult to provide sufficient evidence to satisfy the burden of proof. The claimant is generally not present when the events occur, and the maker of the will is dead.

However, there have been several successful instances of fraudulent calumny in the recent past and the courts have found that where undue influence is pleaded, there is often a considerable overlap.

In this case, Mr Speakman was able to show specific evidence of instances where the defendant influenced his late father against him and HHJ Williams found in his favour, overturning the three 2018 wills.

The team, headed up by partner Richard Bates, advise on a wide range of matter relating to all aspects of contentious probate and trusts. Richard can be contacted on 0115 8525835 or r.bates@rotherabray.co.uk

Disclaimer: This blog is for information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice please contact us on 03456 465 465 or email enquiries@rotherabray.co.uk to get tailored advice specific to your circumstances from our qualified lawyers

Contact Form

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Please give as much detail as possible, to enable us to assess your matter and direct it to the most appropriate person.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Share Post
Related News
Can you be sacked for working a second job whilst off sick?

Can I be sacked for working a second job whilst I’m off sick?

It’s not uncommon for people to have more than one job. But if you’re off sick from one of them and still working the other, can your employer fire you?

Nottingham city centre

Nottingham Attacks survivors give their first interview

Survivors of the Nottingham Attacks have given their first and only TV interview following the June 2023 attack. They shared their experience and hopes for the upcoming Inquiry, as well as what it means for the city they still live in.