Skip to main content Skip to footer

NHS Unfair Dismissal Appeal Allowed at Employee Tribunal

Work meeting between 3 women

A doctor was employed as a consultant at an NHS Hospital but the hospital believed that the doctor had continued to see private patients during her absence despite having been told not to do so while off sick.

Written by
Natalie Abbott, Employment Law Partner at Rothera Bray
Natalie Abbott
Partner & Head of Employment

Following an investigation the hospital started disciplinary proceedings and told the doctor that this allegation was potentially one of gross misconduct which could lead to dismissal.

Disciplinary Panel Findings

The disciplinary panel found that the doctor had worked in private practice while certified sick and in receipt of sick pay.  This amounted to fraud which could be considered as gross misconduct and the doctor was summarily dismissed.  The doctor brought a claim for unfair dismissal.

Employment Tribunal Claim

The Tribunal dismissed her claim, the doctor then appealed arguing that the Tribunal was mistaken on two grounds:

  1. That the hospital had relied on her conduct as amounting to fraud but the Tribunal had failed to identify whether her conduct amounted to fraud.
  2. The Tribunal had jumped straight from identifying gross misconduct to holding that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses enabling it to dismiss.

On the first ground the Court dismissed the appeal.

Know Your Rights

It is a fundamental rule of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings that the individual concerned must know the case that he or she has to meet and in particular must know whether or not the allegation against them is one of dishonesty.

However, in this case there was never any doubt about the allegations against the doctor.  Therefore when following a procedure, labels are less important than it is to clearly specify the points against an employee, alongside the possible consequences.

Despite dismissing the first ground, the employment appeal Tribunal allowed the appeal with regard to justifying whether a finding of gross misconduct automatically justified a finding of unfair dismissal.  Here, the Tribunal had failed to properly analyse whether there were mitigating circumstances that would take the decision out of the range of reasonable responses.

This is the final question which a Tribunal must always ask itself.

Advice About Unfair Dismissal and Appeals

If you are at all unsure about whether a dismissal is fair or unfair, please contact us.  We are always happy to provide you with expert employment law advice, whether you’re an employee or an employer.

Contact Form

Please give as much detail as possible, to enable us to assess your matter and direct it to the most appropriate person.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Share Post
Related News
Employment Law Partner Natalie Abbott breaks down the legalities, practicalities, and best practices around working from home when you’re sick

Can employers ask staff to work from home while on sick leave?

In today’s world of remote work and constant connectivity, the lines between “off sick” and “working from home” can blur. A desire for productivity can come into conflict with a need to recover. But where’s the balance and what does the law say?

There has finally been a breakthrough in the deadlock surrounding the Government’s Employment Rights Bill

Breakthrough on Government’s Employment Rights Bill: what employers need to know about unfair dismissal

There has finally been a breakthrough in the deadlock surrounding the Government’s Employment Rights Bill (“ERB”), which has been the subject of significant back-and-forth between the House of Commons and the House of Lords in recent weeks. In particular, there has been much debate around the qualifying period for unfair dismissal claims but it now appears that a compromise has been reached to enable the ERB to pass without further undue delay.