Skip to main content Skip to footer

Caught browsing: a tribunal’s take on employee’s internet use at work

A recent Employment Tribunal case has raised questions around workplace surveillance, fair disciplinary processes and employee privacy

Can browsing Rightmove on your lunch break get you fired? In one recent Employment Tribunal case, it nearly did-but the employer paid the price.

Written by
Will Trotter

Will Trotter, Solicitor in Rothera Bray’s Employment Law team, unpacks a Tribunal decision that raises questions around workplace surveillance, fair disciplinary processes and employee privacy. A cautionary tale involving covert spyware and questionable evidence, this case offers vital lessons for employers navigating misconduct and dismissal.

Background of the case

In Lanuska v Accountancy MK Service , the claimant, Miss Lanuska, was the sole full-time employee of a small accountancy firm. In July 2023, she was summarily dismissed for allegedly engaging in “private business activities” during work hours, specifically browsing websites like Rightmove, Amazon, and Very on her work computer.

The employer claimed this was a breach of their code of conduct and amounted to gross misconduct. However, the Tribunal found the dismissal to be unfair.

The employment tribunal’s findings

  • The employer had installed spyware on the claimant’s computer to monitor her activity
  • Over two days, she spent one hour and 24 minutes on personal browsing
  • Crucially, the claimant had never been made aware of any workplace policies prohibiting personal internet use
  • The claimant’s director had similarly used her own work computer for personal browsing, undermining the credibility of the alleged misconduct
  • The employer failed to provide proper documentation, disciplinary warnings, or evidence of a fair process
  • Diary entries submitted as evidence were found to be fabricated, including one referencing a conversation with someone who was not in the UK at the time

The Tribunal concluded that the employer had no genuine belief in the misconduct and had likely dismissed the claimant to replace her with the director’s sister.

The outcome

The Tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant:

  • her unfair dismissal claim was successful.
  • she was awarded £14,120.41, including a 20% uplift for the employer’s failure to follow the Acas Code of Practice.

Key takeaways for employers

This case is a powerful reminder that even small businesses must follow fair procedures when handling employee misconduct.

To avoid similar pitfalls:

  • publish clear conduct policies and ensure employees acknowledge them
  • avoid covert monitoring without proper notice and justification
  • follow a fair disciplinary process, including warnings and hearings
  • don’t assume an employee’s length of service is always based on the start date under their contract of employment
  • document everything accurately and honestly

Monitoring and privacy considerations

Although not the central issue in this case, the use of spyware raises serious questions about employee privacy and data protection. Where an employee is covertly monitored, especially in the absence of any prior performance or conduct concerns, they may be able to bring a constructive unfair dismissal claim. This would be based on the argument that the employer’s actions have breached the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, making the working relationship untenable.

To avoid this risk, employers should:

Monitoring should always be justified, proportionate, and clearly communicated. Covert surveillance without a legitimate basis can not only damage employee relations but also expose employers to legal claims.

Whether you’re an employer reviewing your workplace policies or an employee concerned about your rights, Rothera Bray’s Employment team is here to help.

Contact the team on 03456 465 465 or email enquiries@rotherabray.co.uk for tailored advice on data protection, disciplinary procedures, or employment claims.

We can keep you up to date with all the employment law changes that might affect your business in a handy bi-monthly email. Sign up to our Employment Law for Employers newsletter here.

Disclaimer: This blog is for information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice please contact us on 03456 465 465 or email enquiries@rotherabray.co.uk to get tailored advice specific to your circumstances from our qualified lawyers.

Contact Form

Please give as much detail as possible, to enable us to assess your matter and direct it to the most appropriate person.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Share Post
Related News
A glass of fizz can feel like the perfect seasonal touch-but salons are being reminded that serving alcohol without the correct licence could lead to serious legal consequences

Festive fizz or legal risk? Salons urged to check alcohol licensing rules before serving drinks this Christmas

As salons across the UK prepare to add festive sparkle to their client experience, many are considering offering complimentary drinks during appointments. A glass of fizz can feel like the perfect seasonal touch-but industry professionals are being reminded that serving alcohol without the correct licence could lead to serious legal consequences.

We look back at the key highlights and achievements of the past year

Rothera Bray in 2025: a year in review

2025 has been an eventful year for Rothera Bray, marked by strategic growth, community initiatives, and industry recognition. From welcoming new colleagues and a key merger to championing charitable causes and earning prestigious awards, here’s a look back at the key highlights and achievements of the past year.