Opens in a new tab

Public Inquiries

Specialist legal support

What is a public inquiry?

A public inquiry is a formal investigation set up by the government. They are usually called in response to a major failure or failures in systems or services that have shaken public confidence and caused significant public concern. These can include things like major accidents, scandals, or national emergencies.

Past examples include looking into train crashes, fires, disease outbreaks, the handling of pension funds, or how decisions were made that led the UK to war.

Rothera Bray’s serious injury team is currently involved in the Nottingham Inquiry – you can read about our involvement with survivors of the Nottingham Attacks here.

A public inquiry can’t punish anyone or force the government to follow its recommendations. However, it can uncover important evidence that might lead to criminal charges or other action by the authorities. Its recommendations can also lead to changes in laws or government policies if those in power choose to act on them.

Get in touch
Public inquiries

What is the purpose of a public inquiry?

The main goal is to find out what went wrong and how to stop it from happening again.

Public inquiries usually try to answer three big questions:

  1. What happened?
  2. Why did it happen – and who, if anyone, is responsible?
  3. How can we stop this from happening again?

To answer these questions, inquiries collect evidence, analyse documents and talk to witnesses. They also listen to experts, survivors, and others affected to help them form recommendations.

How long do public inquiries take?

Public inquiries often take years – on average, more than three years.

There is no fixed timeline, but here is what usually happens:

  1. The government announces the inquiry and picks someone to lead it (called the chair)
  2. It takes time to decide what the inquiry will cover (called the terms of reference)
  3. Gathering evidence, reviewing documents, and hearing from witnesses can take months or even years
  4. Some inquiries are delayed if there’s a police investigation going on at the same time, since inquiries can’t decide criminal guilt (that’s up to the courts)

What are the stages of a public inquiry?

1. Announcement and terms of reference

This can take from a few weeks to a few months.

  • The Government announces the inquiry
  • A chair is appointed
  • The terms of reference (what the inquiry will cover) are set, often after a short consultation

2. Evidence gathering and preparatory work

This work behind the scenes can last several months, to over a year, dependent on the evidence.

  • The inquiry team sets up
  • Public and private bodies are asked to submit evidence
  • Key documents are collected and reviewed
  • Core participants (people or groups with a special interest) are identified

3. Public hearing

This can last weeks to many months, and is sometimes done in phases.

  • Witnesses give evidence under oath in open sessions
  • Lawyers question witnesses (the public and media may attend or watch)
  • Hearings may be paused for legal reasons or to examine specific issues in detail

4. Analysis and report writing

This can take many months to over a year.

  • All evidence and testimony is reviewed
  • The chair and panel (if applicable) write the report
  • Legal advice and drafting undergo scrutiny to ensure fairness and accuracy

5. Report publication and government response

The publication is relatively quick after the last step (weeks), but responses can take months or more, dependent on the legislation.

  • The final report is published and usually laid before Parliament
  • The report includes findings, conclusions and recommendations
  • The Government may issue a formal response including policy or legal changes

What are the different types of public inquiry?

Statutory inquiries

These governed by the Inquiries Act 2005 and the Inquiry Rules 2006.

These have legal powers and can only be set up by a government minister. They can:

  • Compel people to give evidence
  • Offer legal protections to witnesses
  • Be more independent of government

Non-statutory inquiries

These are more flexible but less powerful. They can be set up by any person or organisation to investigate a specific issue, and they are not governed by the Inquiries Act 2005 or the Inquiry Rules 2006. They:

  • Cannot force people to take part
  • Rely on cooperation
  • May be held in private and sometimes do not publish a report

Sometimes inquiries start off as non-statutory and are later upgraded to statutory so they can get more cooperation or access sensitive information.

Who is involved in a public inquiry?

There are usually several key roles in a public inquiry. Each plays an important part in ensuring the process is fair transparent and effective.

Chair or inquiry chairperson

  • Usually someone with a lot of experience, like a senior judge, legal expert, or respected public figure
  • Chosen by a government minister but works independently from the Government
  • In charge of running the inquiry and making sure it’s fair and impartial
  • Decides how the inquiry will be structured and how it will run
  • Leads the questioning of witnesses and oversees how evidence is handled
  • Works with a legal team and support staff throughout the process
  • Writes the final report, which includes what the inquiry found and what changes are recommended
  • Cannot decide if someone is guilty or award compensation

Inquiry panel

  • If applicable, this would be a group of experts or advisers who assist the chair
  • May include professionals from relevant fields (medicine, housing, ethics)

Counsel to the inquiry

  • A senior barrister or legal team who present evidence, question witnesses and ensure proper legal standards are followed
  • Act in the public interest, not for any specific party

Core participants

  • Individuals or organisations with a significant interest in the inquiry (victims’ families, government departments, companies)
  • May have legal representation and the right to access evidence, make submissions and question witnesses via their lawyers

Witnesses

  • A person with evidence relating to what the inquiry is investigating and the matters set out in the terms of reference. This could be from seeing what happened or having relevant records like videos, photos, or documents.
  • People called to provide written or oral evidence
  • Can include experts, officials, victims, whistleblowers and others
  • In statutory inquiries, witnesses must attend and speak under oath if summoned

Expert witnesses

  • While optional, these can provide technical or specialist insights to help the chair understand complex matters

Inquiry team and secretariat

  • Behind-the-scenes staff who manage admin tasks, public engagement, evidence processing and digital systems like live streaming and document portals

The public and media

  • Public inquiries aim for transparency
  • Members of the public and journalists can usually attend hearings, view evidence online and report on proceedings

Do people have to take part in a public inquiry?

Most of the time, witnesses at a public inquiry are asked to take part voluntarily. But if someone has important evidence and refuses to cooperate, the person leading the inquiry can use legal powers under the Inquiries Act 2005 to force them to attend and give evidence.

 

What is a public hearing?

Public hearings are a key part of a public inquiry. This is when the inquiry examines evidence, investigates the facts, and works toward making findings and recommendations.

During these hearings, witnesses are called to give evidence under oath and are questioned by the inquiry’s legal team, known as Counsel to the inquiry. The process takes place in an open setting, allowing members of the public and the media to observe the proceedings.

Our work on the Nottingham Inquiry

Our team worked with injured survivors of the 2023 Nottingham attacks. Following our campaign for a public inquiry into the event, the Nottingham Inquiry was announced, with Rothera Bray playing a major part.

Our work involved extensive evidence gathering, covering information supplied by the police, health authorities and local government. In 2026, our team supported the survivors and questioned witnesses at the Inquiry in London. Our hard work contributed to its findings.

Nottingham Inquiry information

Contact our Serious Personal Injury and Medical Negligence team

Our public inquiry team

September 2, 2026
Dear Karina, thank you so much for all of your help discussing my birth, reviewing the notes and talking me through the legal process. I am so grateful that you took the time. Understanding the legal process has helped me heal.
- Mrs. L
August 25, 2026
Claire, thank you so much for all of your help discussing my birth, reviewing the notes and talking me through the legal process. I am so grateful that you took the time. Understanding the process has helped me heal
- Mrs. L
August 19, 2026
I would first like to sincerely thank you and counsel for all your help with the inquest. You both have been brilliant and a great support during this process. I know that yourself and other associates have put a lot of effort into this proceeding, and this is very much appreciated.
- Paulina
May 27, 2026
I cannot thank Seetal and Rothera Bray Solicitors enough for all the hard work and support they have given me over the last 4 years with my accident at work claim. They have been extremely thorough, professional, and supportive throughout the entire process. Every step was clearly explained to me, and I always felt like they genuinely cared about getting the best outcome possible. Their attention to detail and dedication gave me a lot of confidence during a very difficult time. Thank you again for everything you have done for me.
- Luke Shiels
January 20, 2026
Greg Almond is an experienced litigator based in Nottingham. He is head of the Serious Injury team. He frequently manages high-value, complex claims arising from RTAs and all manner of tortious incidents, with examples including brain and spinal injuries and amputation. Greg is a compassionate and knowledgeable solicitor. Greg has a proper concern for his clients. He is a very experienced personal injury litigator. Greg Almond is the sort of talent one rarely finds outside of London. He is an excellent personal injury lawyer who understands and supports the needs of his clients.
- Chambers 2026
January 20, 2026
Greg Almond leads the department and is skilled at handling high-profile personal injury cases involving criminal trials, and is also highly active in clinical negligence matters relating to orthopaedic and neurological issues. Great team dealing with catastrophic injury work, very well led by a dynamic partner Greg Almond. Greg has carefully put together a very dedicated team of like-minded individuals around him, who put in the hours to ensure each claim achieves the maximum level of compensation it rightly deserves
- Legal 500 – 2025
November 18, 2025
Throughout the process I dealt with a number of people as the claim was a lengthy process, all of which were both professional and understanding. I was kept up to date throughout the entire process including any cost increases and whenever anyone would be out of office. I would use Rothera Bray again.
- Kirsten
October 9, 2025
I have used Mr Johnson on a few occasions and I will always use him on any other occasion. I have found him to be excellent in his working conduct and to be very thorough in the way he acts during all of his cases.
- Mr Barratt
October 9, 2025
The best thing about Ian was that he was realistic all the way through my case and I really appreciated him not sugar coating any of his answers. I’ve chosen to stay in touch with him and would like to show him how well I’ve developed since I last saw him, because it’s down to him and the other specialists he put me in touch with, that I’ve gotten this far already.
- Mr Mistry
October 9, 2025
Ian not only explained everything in really simple terms, but when required was able to explain the more complex parts of the process. Because Ian had suffered his own head injury, I really got the sense that he knew exactly what I was going through and that he was fighting my corner.
- Mr Dewar
October 9, 2025
All the way through my case Ian was very informative and I really liked that I stayed with the same solicitor, without having to speak to anyone else and explain things again.
- Jane Hood
August 26, 2025
Rothera Bray provided an excellent service to both my Mother and myself during what was a very difficult time for us. They were detailed, professional and supportive. This lead to an outcome that we would not have been able to achieve without their expertise. I would highly recommend Rothera Bray to represent you when making a claim following an accident.
- Ben
July 25, 2025
100% recommend Rothera Bray for any injury claims- especially Rebecca Howard who took her time to answer any queries I had and kept me up go date with the stages of my claim which resulted in a positive and successful claim! Thank you for all the support, your work means so much.
- Chloe
June 17, 2025
I had a head injury and Rothera Bray solicitors dealt with my compensation claim. Rebecca Howard was amazing she gave me guidance and advice and always got back to my calls and emails can’t recommend her enough she will be there for you every step of the way.
- Donna
April 3, 2025
Rothera Bray Solicitors and more specifically Seetal Patel and her team looked after my injury claim after a motorcycle accident that was not my fault. Seetal dedicated her very diligent attention to detail to the process and ensured that every necessary factor was taken into account during my recovery. Her communication was clear and open throughout the process. I would highly recommend Rothera Bray to guide you effectively and provide excellent care throughout your injury recovery and damages claim.
- Malcolm
October 30, 2024
I would like to thank Rothera and Bray Solicitors for all their hard work in representing me in my successful Personal Injury Claim. Their communication and advice was excellent and filled me with confidence throughout my case. On a more personal level I would like to give special thanks to Mr. Ian Johnson and Ms. Swati Kotecha with whom I had most contact with who both were very friendly and professional and made the whole experience as simple as possible. Thank you again.
- Ron Foster

Latest Serious Personal Injury and Medical Negligence news

serious-personal-injury-and-medical-negligence"}],"useQueryEditor":true,"signature":"5a35718fc269cc2f732bb2c8a24433cb","user_id":2,"time":1787559982,"post_status":"publish","orderby":"date","order":"DESC","ignore_sticky_posts":true,"tax_query":[{"taxonomy":"department","field":"term_id","terms":[169],"include_children":true}],"paged":1}" data-original-query-vars="[]" data-page="1" data-max-pages="36" data-start="1" data-end="3">